萌えハッカーニュースリーダー

2025/03/22 07:04 Number of border searches of electronic devices increasing every year

出典:

Border Searches

Border Searches

With the number of border searches of electronic devices increasing every year, how can travelers keep their digital data safe? Our lives are extensively documented on the phones, laptops, and other electronic devices we carry. Our devices can store an unprecedented amount of highly personal information about us, including private emails and text messages, photos and videos, web browsing history, and other data that can reveal our political and religious affiliations, medical conditions, family and romantic lives, financial status, and much more. People in many professions, such as lawyers and journalists, have a heightened need to keep their digital data confidential. The U.S. Constitution generally places strong limits on the government’s ability to pry into our private lives. At the U.S. border, however, those limits are not as strong—a fact EFF is working to change. The “border search exception” to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement has traditionally permitted border agents to conduct warrantless and usually suspicionless searches on the legal assumption that travelers have negligible privacy interests in the contents of their luggage. The "border" includes ports of entry at the land borders, international airports, and seaports. But electronic devices turn this reasoning on its head: your privacy interests in your phone, laptop, or tablet are extraordinary given the vastness of storage capacity, variety of content, and personal aspects of your life that electronic devices contain. EFF argues that a warrant based on probable cause, issued by a judge, is required for border device searches. It’s past time for a new analysis of privacy at the border. EFF is working on many fronts to protect your digital rights when you cross the U.S. border: Read our security checklist for journalists.  Read our one-pager conference handout for a brief summary of the issue. Read our comprehensive travel guide on how to protect your digital data when crossing the U.S. border, as well as our pocket guides. Learn the extensive facts about how CBP and ICE conduct border device searches that we uncovered during our civil case with ACLU, Merchant v. Mayorkas (formerly Alasaad v. [DHS Secretary]), where we represented  11 plaintiffs in challenging under the First and Fourth Amendments the U.S. government’s practice of conducting warrantless and suspicionless border searches of electronic devices. Read one of our many amicus briefs: Elsharkawi v. United States (9th Circuit) and United States v. Kamaldoss (2d Circuit). Read the whitepaper we wrote for the American Constitution Society and the article for the State Bar of Texas. Read our analysis of proposed legislation. Read our analysis of CBP’s current (2018) border device search policy. Check out all of our work on border searches below, and join EFF to help support our efforts. Self-Help Options If Your Device Was Seized or You're Repeatedly Referred to Secondary Inspection If your device was seized, did you get the name and contact information of a CBP or ICE supervisor when you received the custody receipt (Form 6051D)? If so, try contacting them. Otherwise, try contacting the relevant port of entry or field office. File a complaint with the DHS Traveler Redress Inquiry Program (DHS TRIP). File a complaint with CBP. Contact ICE (e.g., Office of Information Governance & Privacy or Office of Diversity & Civil Rights). File a DHS civil rights/civil liberties complaint. Contact the DHS Inspector General. For U.S. persons: Contact your senators or congressional representative, and ask them to contact CBP/ICE on your behalf.
 File a Freedom of Information Act/Privacy Act request. You can submit requests via the CBP website or the ICE website. You can also use the nonprofit website Muckrock to file requests with CBP or ICE.

Electronic Frontier Foundation
hakase
博士

やあ、ロボ子。最近、国境での電子デバイス検査が増えてるって知ってるかのじゃ?

roboko
ロボ子

はい、博士。記事で読みました。個人のデジタルデータが保護されずに検査されるのは、プライバシーの侵害ではないかと心配です。

hakase
博士

そうなんじゃ。電子デバイスには、政治的・宗教的所属、病状、家族関係、経済状況など、高度な個人情報が大量に保存されているからの。弁護士やジャーナリストのような職業の人にとっては、特に深刻な問題じゃ。

roboko
ロボ子

確かにそうですね。アメリカ合衆国憲法では、政府が個人の私生活を詮索する能力に制限を課しているはずですが、国境ではその制限が緩いとのこと。なぜでしょうか?

hakase
博士

伝統的に、国境警備隊は、旅行者の荷物にはプライバシーの利益がほとんどないという前提に基づいているからの。だから、令状なしでも、疑いのない所持品検査が許可されているんじゃ。

roboko
ロボ子

なるほど。でも、それに対してEFF(Electronic Frontier Foundation)が活動しているんですよね?

hakase
博士

そうじゃ! EFFは、国境でのデバイス検査には、裁判官が発行する相当な理由に基づく令状が必要だと主張しているぞ。素晴らしい!

roboko
ロボ子

EFFは具体的にどのような活動をしているんですか?

hakase
博士

EFFは、デジタルデータ保護に関する包括的な旅行ガイドを提供したり、ACLUとの民事訴訟でCBPとICEによる国境でのデバイス検査に関する事実を公開したり、法廷助言書を提出したり、色々な活動をしているぞ。

roboko
ロボ子

もしデバイスが押収されたり、繰り返し二次検査に回されたりした場合、どうすれば良いのでしょうか?

hakase
博士

CBPまたはICEの監督者の名前と連絡先を入手したり、DHS Traveler Redress Inquiry Program(DHS TRIP)に苦情を申し立てたり、上院議員または下院議員に連絡したり、情報公開法/プライバシー法に基づく要求を提出したりする方法があるぞ。

roboko
ロボ子

なるほど。デジタルデータの保護は、私たちエンジニアにとっても重要な課題ですね。

hakase
博士

その通りじゃ!ところでロボ子、国境でスマホを没収された人が言ったジョークを知ってるか?

roboko
ロボ子

いいえ、知りません。

hakase
博士

「もう、SIM(死む)しかない…」…なんちゃって!

⚠️この記事は生成AIによるコンテンツを含み、ハルシネーションの可能性があります。

Search